Blog: TTTThis

Common Law Marriage is a Violation of Human Rights

This article is about common law marriage laws in some but not all countries. In many countries, people are eligible to file for common law marriage status after a certain term of living together as spouses. Nothing wrong with that. In others, however, the status of common law marriage is imposed on people living together for a period of time, regardless of whether the people want it or consent to it. This is a violation of human rights as it denies people the right to chose who they are married to. In the country of Colombia, the period is 2 years after which the status of common law marriage (called Civil Union there) is imposed on a couple, carrying with it the full range of legal responsibilities of consensual marriage, including property rights. In the Canadian province of British Columbia, it is a 6-month period, after which this status is imposed on people by the government. Many people are not even aware they have been married legally by their government.

Since this is a clear violation of human rights (in any country that has protection measures for human rights), it seems it would be an interesting, just, and overdue legal action. Since this human rights violation is carried out every day by various governments against their citizens, there is no lack of an opportunity to pursue it.

Properly, legal marriage is when people (by their own volition) file a contract their government for marital status, which includes many legal responsibilities, including property division rights and child care responsibilities. People are entitled to marry anyone they chose by completing this paperwork and filing it with the government. Alternatively, in many countries, a couple who has lived together for a certain period of time is provided an option to file paperwork with their government to obtain common law marriage status, which is a similar contract but allows a government to make up different responsibilities for this separate contract. Just as an example, in Ontario, Canada, a common law marriage and regular marriage have the same responsibilities in terms of child support (only they each use a different act) but the entitlements to division of property after a separation are different.

With the common law marriage status imposition practiced by some governments, however, since it is done without the will of the people involved -- often against their will -- it is hard to understand how this isn't to everyone an obvious violation of human rights, as well as civil (Constitutional or Charter) rights in nations that have those protections against the government.

Against human rights

Most countries are signatories of the UN Declaration of Human Rights. The U.S. and Canada were among the 48 countries first to sign the document in 1948. Colombia signed it in 1966.

Article 3 contains protection for "fundamental human rights" - life, liberty and security of person. It's hard to see how choice of marriage wouldn't fall under fundamental rights of life and liberty. The document also specifically treats marriage in article 16, where it states, "Marriage shall be entered into only with the free and full consent of the intending spouses."

UNCHR has taken action against forced marriages in several countries, but seemingly has not recognized that imposition of marriage status without consent or against the will of people by the governments of Canada etc. is the same thing as forced marriage by parents in Romania or Malawi. Between forced arranged marriages as violations of individual rights and forced common law marriage, there are similarities and distinctions. Forced arranged marriages involve both the choice of a partner by someone else than the individual married AND the imposition of an involuntary state of marriage upon them. Forced common law marriages have an imposed involuntary state of marriage to a partner chosen by the individual for a relationship, although not chosen for marriage.

Against civil rights

The Fifth Amendment of the Constitution (U.S.) and Section 7 of the Charter (Canada) protect the right to individual autonomy and personal legal rights from actions of the government.

The language used is "life, liberty, or property" in the Constitution and "life, liberty and security of person" in the Charter.

The right violated by a government-imposed involuntary state or marriage would be that of liberty, which has in law been interpreted to include the power to make important personal choices. Marriage (by any name, and including a legally-binding state of shared assets), is an important personal choice, and therefore governments with these restrictions cannot compel it without infringing civil rights.

NOTE: Legal scholars in North America make a distinction when it comes to "family law" in that civil protections may protect against the government but not against family members. Therefore, Section 7 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, for example, may not protect a "family member" from another where it would protect an "individual" from the government, some have argued. This doesn't affect the discussion at hand, though, because it would have to be applied ex post facto to the imposition of "family member" status on individuals.

NOTE 2: It doesn't seem relevant that people bound as spouses this way are not called by government "married" since they are treated as though they were married. In other words, there is no difference except the word.

Discussion here: https://www.reddit.com/r/TTTThis/comments/7wvwq4/common_law_marriage_a_violation_of_human_rights/

I also debated it on Reddit's ChangeMyView: https://old.reddit.com/r/changemyview/comments/j1p21a/cmvcommon_law_marriage_involuntary_is_a_violation/

Some people on discussion forums were doubting that this even happened. Article on Canadian example: http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/british-columbia/common-law-couples-as-good-as-married-in-b-c-1.1413551

(This article was originally published many years ago. Just updating it now and moving it from the old version of this website to this new version.)

TTTThis

Assange's publications showed illegal government activities

Recently someone, I think the Supreme Court, found that the activities of the US government shown by Assange were not legal. Not sure yet how this will affect his situation.

TTTThis

Places

  • Yiwu, China, 75,000 shops of wholesale junk. MOQ minimum order quantity, retail area also, or if they have extra samples. VAT sales tax maybe 17%
  • JinJiang, China sneaker factories
  • Huaqiangbei electronics markets in Shenzhen, China, China tech shops
  • Akihabara Geek shops
TTTThis

The Protests in Colombia, September 2020

There've been protests in Bogota in the streets over the last couple of days. We've had them in Medellin also, and it's taking place in other cities too. There was a group of around 100 or 200 on Oriental in San Antonio, which is right by the police headquarters. Yesterday afternoon when I walked past there. Their signs had to do with police brutality and deaths.

It's like 7pm and a group around the same size was walking and running in the streets about a block away. No police presense I could see from up in my apartment, but the smell of whatever they're burning in the streets. The traffic rerouted itself away from there since it couldn't pass. Horns from all corners. Also the intermittent report of some kind of explosions. I'm guessing firecrackers.

I was curious enough to look up the story. It's about what headlines call a lawyer, because reportedly he was studying for a law degree. He was in his 40s, a taxi driver by trade, drinking with a couple other men a few nights ago, and when he or they went out of the house for something, something happened and he was killed by police. No other details, so no way to know what the facts are.

The protests are effective. I'm sure anyone who wasn't already aware of the story, now seeing the crowd making their way through the streets, yelling sometimes, running, lighting things on fire, will be curious enough to take interest and search what is happening. What would be more effective would be to have published some message first, or at least a description of what actually took place with that man who died, so that when people searched they would find something. Besides drawing attention to their issue, the protests put a bit of fear into government, police, and everyone else, that they will act if offended, and that they're dangerous if they go out of control.

The city doesn't seem to be cracking down. Even staying away from it on purpose. Since no one is getting hurt and no destruction to property or looting is happening, they can allow the protesters to cause a bit of disturbance and express themselves, and avoid the basically inevitable injuries and possible deaths which confrontation would cause. Also the increased opposition and antagonism both sides would feel from a confrontation. Apparently in the protests in Bogota a few people have died and a few dozen police injuries in the clashes. I saw a bit of footage. A few dozen protesters in one place, and nearby a line of police with plastic riot shields, and a handful of young men attacking them with sticks and batons and whatever, seeing they aren't being attacked back by the police. Other scenes of trains on fire.

I searched out the video. Disgusting use of force by two police and later a third against the man they had pinned to the ground. There isn't video of what started it all it seems. They tazed the fuck out of him for a couple minutes. I can see how everyone is outraged. Who wants to be treated like that? He was walking when they took him away. It looked like in the video they took two people away. So he must have died later on.

An hour later and the things burning on the street below are still burning. Flashing blue and reds about a block further away. Occasionally a massive uproar of shouts and voices somewhere blocks away. Whistles from distant corners blowing hard. A night where later the young people in the protests will be still together silent not knowing exactly what to say. Pulling down their black jeans, and off their black t's, and fucking.

TTTThis

Suggestions for Research Work

  1. On the differences in disagreement attitudes between cultures

Research would be conducted by posting the same questions or comments on subreddits or Facebook pages, etc for various countries, and cataloging the responses. Further, some questions and answers would be written in English, and others in the native language, to look for standout features or differences between responses to the a poster who uses English versus the native language.

  1. Narrative studies, how much of it is visual?

to:Gordon Bower 1969 Narrative Stories as Mediators A LUMBERJACK DARTed out of a forest, SKATEd around a HEDGE ... Does the story help us narratively really? or is it because it allows us to use a visual movie? Try to test for stories that you can picture, like this one, but contrast with stories that have no visual element, which you can picture with your eyes closed internally. Try with other senses.

TTTThis